Pricing & Packaging as a Growth System

In collaboration with Ashley Murphy, Former VP Pricing & Market Strategy, Toast

‍

Stop Searching for the 'Right' Price

‍

Early on, it's tempting to believe there's a correct answer hiding somewhere—a price point that neatly balances adoption, revenue and margin. Find it, lock it in and move on.

‍

That's not how real markets behave.

‍

In vertical SaaS especially, price sensitivity isn't uniform. For example, a single-location restaurant opening its first store experiences value very differently than a multi-unit operator running dozens of locations. They're purchasing the product for different jobs. They feel risk differently. They buy on different timelines, for different reasons. Flattening that reality into a single pricing structure can create immediate friction—you slow adoption at the low end or undercharge customers who would willingly pay more, and often manage to do both at once.

‍

One of the subtler traps here is survivorship bias. When you look only at customers who made it far enough through your funnel to request a demo, the funnel looks healthy. But a much larger group may have never engaged at all because the price scared them off. The data looks fine; the market is quietly telling a different story.

‍

That reframe changes the question. Pricing stops being about finding the 'right' number and becomes something more practical: what are we solving for at this stage of our growth?

‍

Framed this way, pricing decisions become questions of sequence—reducing friction early to capture market share, using packaging to increase ACV over time, and sequencing multi-product adoption in your customer base

‍

The Four-Phase Sequencing Model

‍

Pricing that compounds doesn't stay fixed—it evolves with the customer. And the most durable pricing systems evolve in a predictable sequence: from removing friction, to clarifying value, to expanding reach, to shaping the market itself.

‍

Across vertical SaaS companies that have scaled through $500M+ in ARR, a consistent pattern emerges. Each phase has a distinct objective, a distinct mechanism, and a distinct definition of success. 

‍

Phase 1: Capture Share

Objective: Velocity over value capture

‍

In early markets, the primary pricing job is to make the first purchase decision easy. Customers are evaluating whether your category is worth buying at all—not which tier to choose. Pricing that removes friction at this stage generates the velocity needed to build market presence.

‍

✓ Aim for: Shorter sales cycles, higher win rates, faster time-to-live.

⚠ Watch out for: CAC is rising, and you're still explaining what you do.

‍

Phase 2: Packaging Simplification

Objective: Turn value into a repeatable story

‍

As the product catalog grows, complexity becomes the enemy of adoption. Buyers can't purchase what they can't evaluate. The fix isn't better pricing—it's better packaging. Tiered structures anchored to real customer jobs give buyers a clear decision path and give reps a clear selling motion.

‍

The best packaging creates a single proof point that travels through the sales cycle without explanation. When every rep knows the number that connects a package to an outcome—and believes it—the selling system gets dramatically more efficient. ARPU growth at this phase is a packaging outcome, not a pricing one.

‍

✓ Aim for: Every rep can articulate the same proof point without prompting.

⚠  Watch out for: Discounts are the default escape hatch when tiers don't fit.

‍

Phase 3: Segment Expansion

Objective: Reach customers your current model excludes

‍

Once you own a segment, the natural next question is who you're still leaving out. Price sensitivity, buying behavior, and unit economics vary dramatically across customer types. A pricing model optimized for one segment will actively exclude another.

‍

Segment expansion often requires a fundamentally different pricing mechanism—not a lower price on the same model. Usage-based components, consumption tiers, or alternative entry points can unlock entirely new customer cohorts without cannibalizing the core business.

‍

✓ Aim for: You enter a new segment without rebuilding your product.

⚠ Watch out for: Every new segment requires a new pricing model from scratch.

‍

Phase 4: Revenue Expansion

Objective: Let pricing shape the market

‍

At scale, pricing stops being reactive and starts being strategic. Products that once required separate selling motions get reorganized around customer jobs, creating clear upsell pathways that customers can navigate on their own terms. New features slot into existing value structures rather than requiring new justification.

‍

This is the phase where pricing creates compounding. Customers understand how value grows with their business. Expansion revenue becomes a function of the system—not of heroic sales effort.

‍

✓ Aim for: Expansion revenue is expected, not celebrated.

⚠  Watch out for: Every new product requires a new internal pricing debate.

‍

The sequence matters as much as any individual decision. Skipping a phase doesn't accelerate growth—it creates the conditions for the next pricing crisis.

‍

Knowing the sequence is the easy part. Executing it requires a system underneath.

‍

Governance Beats Genius

One of the most persistent misconceptions about pricing is that it's primarily an analytical problem. Get better data. Build better models. Hire smarter people. That's the instinct.

‍

Data matters. But at scale, it's rarely what breaks. What actually fails is governance.

‍

Pricing falls apart because no one owns the system. Sales wants flexibility. Finance wants predictability. Product wants simplicity. Marketing wants a clean story. Every perspective is rational. Without clear ownership, decisions drift and pricing turns political.

‍

The fix is structural, not analytical. Pricing needs:

‍

• Unambiguous ownership: one team accountable for outcomes (adoption, expansion, retention) even when the right answer is uncomfortable
• A pricing committee that coordinates decisions across marketing, finance, sales and product
• Agreed-upon principles that govern how exceptions get handled before the exception arrives

‍

Pricing compounds when it's governed. It degrades when it isn't.

‍

Packaging Is the Interface

Price doesn't live on its own. Customers experience pricing through packaging, and that's often where pricing strategies quietly fall apart.

‍

Bad packaging creates work. Customers struggle to map plans to what they actually need. Sales spends time translating tiers instead of selling outcomes. Discounts become the default escape hatch when nothing quite fits.

‍

Good packaging does the opposite. It reduces thinking, makes tradeoffs visible, and allows customers to recognize themselves in an option without a long explanation.

‍

One useful internal framework: sort your products into Leaders, Fillers and Killers.

‍

• Leaders drive adoption and anchor the value story
• Fillers add revenue without complicating the narrative
• Killers create confusion, cannibalize other products, or require more selling effort than they return

‍

Packaging discipline means knowing which is which and structuring tiers accordingly. When packaging matches how customers think about their own business, the entire system starts to move with less force. 

‍

Usage-Based Models: Leverage, Not Magic

Usage-based pricing often gets talked about like it's a shortcut: tie price to consumption, align value automatically, and let the model do the work.

‍

Done poorly, usage pricing creates anxiety. Customers worry about runaway bills. Sales struggles to explain variability. Finance can't forecast cleanly.

‍

When it works, it's because it mirrors how customers experience success. The clearest example: payment processing tied to transaction volume. When your customer makes more money, you make more money. When business slows, costs flex with it. Customers don't feel punished for growing. That alignment is what makes the model durable.

‍

Usage pricing only works because it lives inside a broader system. You need to be:

‍

• Deliberate about where usage applies
• Explicit about what drives charges
• Invested in making bills understandable

‍

When those conditions are met, usage pricing does one thing extremely well: it lets customers pay more only after they've already received value. It scales with success instead of ahead of it.

‍

It's not magic. It's leverage. And like any leverage, it amplifies whatever structure you put underneath it.

‍

If Every Change Requires Heroics, Pricing Freezes

Most pricing failures don't start with bad decisions. They start when the systems underneath pricing can't absorb change.

‍

You see it when teams hesitate to run a test they know would be useful—not because the idea is risky, but because the fallout will be. Billing can't support another SKU. Contracts lock customers into terms that no longer make sense. Sales comp won't reconcile. Finance needs to model impact. What should be a small experiment turns into a cross-functional incident. So pricing freezes. Not officially, but in practice.

‍

When that happens, teams compensate in familiar ways: discounts, custom deals, side letters, manual workarounds. None of those show up as 'pricing changes,' but they quietly erode the system anyway.

‍

The early investment that makes pricing movable is unglamorous:

• Flexible billing that can support new SKUs and pricing mechanisms
• Clean SKU logic that doesn't require manual workarounds
• Contracts that allow movement without triggering renegotiation
• Compensation plans that don't punish reps for selling into change

‍

Infrastructure doesn't make pricing good. It makes good pricing possible.

‍

Pricing as a Strategic Weapon

Most teams think about pricing defensively: how do we protect margin, avoid churn or keep sales from giving away the farm? Those are reasonable questions. They're also incomplete.

‍

The strongest pricing systems don't just defend revenue. They quietly change where a company is allowed to play.

‍

Some of the most consequential pricing decisions aren't about extracting more value from existing customers. They're about unlocking customers who couldn't be reached at all under the old model: small operators who required simplicity; larger groups who needed control; adjacent categories that only became viable once pricing reshaped the entry point.

‍

That's the difference between pricing as optimization and pricing as strategy. When pricing is treated as a system, it becomes a way to sequence market access. You can lower the barrier to entry for one segment without collapsing your margin structure. You can expand scope without confusing the core. Each move builds on the last.

‍

The mistake teams make is treating expansion as a one-time pricing event—a new plan, a new SKU, a special carve-out. That approach scales complexity faster than revenue. What works better is extending an existing system that customers already understand. New products fit into familiar packages. Value is legible. Sales doesn't need a new script every quarter.

‍

Over time, customers internalize the framework. They know how value expands and what growth will cost. Pricing stops reacting to the market and starts to shape it.

‍

The Compounding Effect

When pricing works, you don't notice it every day. That's the point.

‍

But the signs are there: shorter sales cycles, expansion that feels expected, not forced, and new products slot into existing packages without weeks of internal debate. 

‍

None of that feels dramatic in the moment. It's cumulative. Growth is a fun ride, not a smooth one. The job of a strong pricing muscle isn't to smooth every bump, but to make sure the system holds together and compounds through change instead of breaking.

‍

That compounding shows up as momentum. Quarter after quarter, your organization wastes less energy translating, explaining or apologizing for its own economics. Pricing fades into the background—not because it's unimportant, but because it's working.

‍

Closing Thought

Stop treating pricing as a moment. Build pricing as a system.

‍

Moments invite debate, reward persuasion, and ultimately fade once the decision ships. Systems are different. They force ownership, reward consistency, and improve with use.

‍

Treat pricing the same way you treat your product architecture or your GTM motion. Give it clear owners. Agree on principles. Invest in the plumbing. Stay close to real buying behavior. And accept that evolution isn't a failure mode—it's the job.

‍

Pricing isn't about being right. It's about being durable. And in Vertical SaaS, durability is what actually carries you through scale.